Sunday, April 29, 2012

Portfolio


Portfolio Paper
            Over the past odd number of weeks, you have taught to our class a sum of things which I have directly functioned to my work. The thing which I focus on and have concluded to be the meaning and purpose of my life are the fecund realms of visual and audial creation—the making of art and music. Through these facilitations of expression I have found my true will, and upon taking your class I have discovered new ways to approach a very important aspect of art: communication to the public of my ideas and creations. There are several different ways to approach art to the public, and it has become very fickle in this world of ever-developing technology. The digital realm creates an atmosphere which earlier artists did not have to deal with; therefore the approach to it cannot be looked at elsewhere in history. But, I have devised my method in accordance the concepts which have been taught to us throughout the semester.
            The process I use to materialize a composition of music or art usually goes through several stages of meditative development and studies. For example, I will develop an idea for a composition for a painting through several days of constantly thinking about the entirety of it. Once I have a cohesive image in my head, I put my hands to work to perform various studies in relation to the composition’s subject matter. The most important elements for me to develop a painting most concisely are form, color, execution, thought process, texture, line work, and a few varying others. Music usually follows a similar process.
            Using Black Brothers as an example, (http://oldhomeorchard.blogspot.com/2012/04/black-brothers.html), we sketch out the idea of the song using a variation of methods which base their selves off of a single part which acts as the main idea, though a final version many have this part become a minor section of the overall composition or vice versa. After singling out the core idea, we improvise off of it for a certain amount of time and usually leave and think about the natural variations or extensions we created through automatic ensemble production. Upon the next meeting time, we talk about how we should execute writing the composition and being to toy with ideas—you cannot be genuinely decisive if you do not perform the idea in fullest form. This part of the process is a varying game of trial and error to which the final product is arrived at eventually.
            The important part of creation through expression though is communicating your ideas and pieces to the public as music and art are the true languages of humanity. As a painter, I must understand wholly the audience which will directly relate to my paintings however I may approach them. I have found an audience which relates to my work and that audience usually is found among the people who enjoy the facilitations of painting. A large problem with modern art in the West is the idea of practicality. “This painting looks pretty, but what can it do for me?” This is still an issue I am having trouble with. However, I can ignore that in some regard, given my do-it-yourself, organic approach, and find myself more accessible to an audience who are similar to me. In a sense, I cannot force a square to fit in the place of a circle; audiences are very concise with their likings. It is difficult to change their perception completely. The digital world provides grounds to publish work freely to the public, but the importance of physical and oral communication has not yet diminished. The artist and musician must speak to the people about himself. He must resonate with his work to communicate to the audience in the best way possible to see what he means, or what they both mean. It is important to convey your thoughts with the common person if you plan to publish your work.
            The criteria displayed on my blog are a few works I have completed upon taking your class. As you can see a distinct and obvious change in style, the approach is no different. Themes and symbols displayed in earlier illustrations contrive themselves in a more organic but veiled sense in later paintings, which are beginning to focus on the human form. Through studying various artist, I have found myself more appropriating an Expressionistic style, specifically from the areas of Eastern Europe around the time of the late 1800’s/early 1900’s. The compositional elements begin to take on an very intrinsic, self-studying atmosphere as though the viewer’s thought must turn to face directly his own life and mind. Through seclusion of forms, perhaps an isolated memory developed through sensory perception is invoked, thus striking relation to the painting and giving it their own vanity and meaning. This is important to the artist to do if he wants to be an artist of the public—of his fellow man. Simply, the way to do this is to understand the struggles of his brother in an empathetic manner.
            Throughout my life, I will use methods derived from your class to appropriate my work to the public. Communication is one of the most important things to becoming a successful artist and musician. Understanding my audience and further shaping and sculpting my work through meticulous procedure deems to be the most advantageous method to do so. My career is steady with productivity and work, and it is something that I do not see slowing down occurring anytime soon. With that said, thank you for the ideas and resources to further develop my execution of work to a bigger audience.

Black Brothers

This is an ensemble consisting of me, my brother Justin, and Tyler Wall. You can find the music we make here on http://blackbrothersva.bandcamp.com/ .

Painting of a girl



Study and Self-Portrait pushing on face



Self-Portrait and study



Self-Portait


States of Mind


Milk


Young Heaven


Self-Portrait in Distress and accompanying study (of many)



Gravedancer II and accompanying study (of many)



Declaration of Rights


Declaration of Rights
            The rights of man have been formulated and administered by those who are in power or in office. Sometimes the ones in power clench the throats of the people and forcibly grasp control themselves by will, or sometimes we elect and choose those who will lead us down the road of civilized society. Civilization has shone a very truthful and shining light on a simple fact that the regressive, primal nature of man needs an overruling force for which governs the ethos of mankind. This is not to disclaim anarchical possibilities, but theoretical concepts are often lofty and unrealistic at that. The rights claimed to us in the Western world derive from the theoretical concepts, however, of the minds of classical men, more often than not from the Age of Enlightenment or believers in such a cultural movement. But the still lofty products of the Enlightenment period have been diluted in a modern age. The empowered have corrupted certain natural rights of man for the establishment of personal advantage and an irrelevant, inflictive agenda against the citizens and their society which wholly disavows certain decrees in the foundational document The French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen.
The French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen was a document conceived in the year of 1789. This document was pivotal to the French Revolution (1789-1799) and outlined the rights of the individual and it’s relating collective under the rule of the state. The document has basis in the doctrine of “natural rights”, or the idea of human nature as universality. The concepts in the document derive from the Age of Enlightenment, and from Rousseau’s Social Contract theory which touches on individualism and other Enlightenment concepts in their relation to societal hierarchy and governing rule. These ideas were products from natural law and order and do not rely on religious doctrine or theocracy. This was very important to the French Revolution as it introduced, and later induced, a more or less true freedom—the document brought reality to what Enlightenment thinkers only theorized.
            These declarations, compiled from the ideas of many men, should be constantly withheld, universally valid, and collectively and individually adhered. The concepts materialized within the document were regarded as democratic and even anarchic during the French Revolution, which were then divulged as abhorrent or mere metaphysical, theoretical fluff by some. However, the Revolutionaries saw hope within this idea and continued to execute its reality, which it so endearingly received. This bloom attained notice from the early American settlers and thinkers—men such as Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and many more. Documents as influentially important as the United States’ Declaration of Independence borrow affluent ideas from this, and retain a basis of natural rights based on human nature. James Madison’s Bill of Rights also touched on the subjects encapsulated by the French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen.
            As the original idea was translated and adopted by figures of early American development these concepts and decrees can be associated with our modern society. However, some of the document has become completely misconstrued or overlooked by the power hungry or ones “in charge.” One can dissect a few of these decrees and apply them to a modern facilitation and see how mutated the original idea has become. The twelfth decree within the document reads as follows:
            The security of the rights of man and of the citizen requires public military forces. These forces are, therefore, established for the good of all and not for the personal advantage of those to whom they shall be entrusted.
            This decree relates to the police force of the nation, or the safeguard force which should serve and protect the citizens without any personal gain or absorption of power. In direct reflection to our modern society, this idea has devolved into a militaristic herding technique. In other words, the police force which we hope to serve and protect has become unfortunately endowed and abusive with the only thing which could separate the citizens from the force: power. It is not out of the ordinary for one to be overwhelmed with a flood of anxiety upon the presence of the so called “civilian force”; for example, the feeling evoked when driving passed a police officer with a radar gun. Even if one has not done any unlawful act, which could be defined as an act harmful to the society as a whole, one continues to have a feeling of anxiety or fear or uncomfortability. One could even relate this relationship to the type shared within the institutionalized confines of prison between the inmates and the guards. It seems as though the modern police force herds its sheepish citizens into line as a derivative of abusive power.
            This type of absent-minded, selfish abuse is obviously apparent in Western society, as the earlier ideals are completely ignored. One could retreat to the larger scope and claim that this relationship has grown within the entire political system of the West. This concept then touches on another decree of the French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen. It is the second decree, obviously adopted by Thomas Jefferson in a later year within the United States Declaration of Independence read as:
 We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”
The second decree of the document reads as:
The aim of all political association is the preservation of the natural and imprescriptible rights of man. These rights are liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
It is obvious that the empowered have corrupted the natural outlined rights of man in both of the scenarios. We live in a society which cowers in mass hysteria from the outcome of the extremist attack on September 11, 2001, and as a result of the attack the world trembles in paranoia a la the Red Scare of the Cold War. Our government, through things passed such as the Patriot Act, has denied us of certain nature rights outlined in the document, the most obvious being security. There is a certain oppression governing forces has placed on the citizens for agenda which seem oddly specific in accordance with some vague concept such as terrorism. Terrorism can be defined as: the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes; a terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government. (Dictionary.com). Oddly enough, the origin of the word “terrorism” is traced back to around 1785.
This idea can be used as a buffer to deter rights from the citizens which the empowered believe they have a kind of control over. With this reality unfolding, an uneasy vibration disrupts the waters of justice and natural order idealized by the thinkers who established the very government we supposedly abide by today. The people of the Western world are succumbing to an infringement of law and to a world of synthetic oppression guided by hysteria and an imposed weakness of the people. The French Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen has laid a solid foundation to the grounds of the Western world which has been finely shaped by the masons of centuries past—our forefathers—and shall not be intruded upon for the imposition of coercion of the people by the personal agenda of those we have placed in a position of power.

Thursday, April 19, 2012

This Blog

...is going to be used for my ENG 112 class with Dr. Brandon. Here I will post relevant criteria to a projected digital portfolio, which will aide our final paper.